Table 2. Proximate composition and energy value of model system meat emulsions
Treatments1) | Moisture (%) | Protein (%) | Fat (%) | Ash (%) | Energy value (kcal/g) |
C | 62.19±0.17d | 19.76±0.35d | 14.16±0.68a | 2.33±0.04d | 214.01±1.59a |
A1 | 64.89±0.29b | 20.49±0.46c | 12.01±0.62b | 3.18±0.03c | 190.43±0.71b |
A2 | 64.10±0.11c | 21.08±0.09b | 8.39±0.94c | 3.52±0.02b | 175.67±1.06c |
A3 | 65.81±0.18a | 22.13±0.14a | 5.84±1.63d | 3.76±0.01a | 148.30±1.45d |
All Values represented as mean±SD.
The treatments were formulated as follows: C: control (100% beef). A1: 20% of beef meat was substituted with amaranth gel. A2: 30% of beef meat was substituted with amaranth gel. A3: 40% of beef meat was substituted with amaranth gel.
Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).